Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.85.248.194; envelope-from=john@lowcountrydata.com
Message-ID: <43E93F86.1000606@lowcountrydata.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:47:02 -0500
From: John with LowcountryData <john@lowcountrydata.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] RX-8
References: <list-974148@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-974148@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dare I ask why they are junk????

Because the subject states RX8 I assume the RX7 is not included in this. 
but because I am interested in understanding the in s and out s of the 
RX8 .... are there any specific reasons, why nots, don't leave us in the 
dark like this <LOL> facts man ... facts!!!!!

JOhnZ


randy echtinaw wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>    I have the opportunity to purchase a 4 port or a 6 port RX-8  engine. 
> I thought I wanted a 4 port because I thought it would be  easier to 
> muffel. I just heard a "rumor" that the 4 port is junk and  go with the 
> 6 port. I need 220-230 hp using the 2.85 PSRU, no turbo.  I would 
> consider P-porting if absolutely necessary to get the HP.  Obviously, I 
> know very little about engines and want to start with  the best I can 
> get so, considering my needs which one do I want?
> Thank you,
> Randy
> 
> -- 
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
> 
> 
> .
>