X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTP id 955889 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:40:58 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.196; envelope-from=russell.duffy@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so662973wra for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:40:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:importance:in-reply-to:x-mimeole; b=Yg8wM/xVLyie5eUrOUmgGyGNrSjuRkr+QngCGc5r8o/eNBUUYVGoaTvl9puzJEG50q0sKV37uJq/2SxS3gJu4xR7pqAL6OvInQoXyyIlRfWnZ848Jx8CZy4eKL3CX+RTyh0UD2UsuE1SiTlzPZO9clUZnkgdf8OOgFRRbU1fnTY= Received: by 10.54.147.1 with SMTP id u1mr3577968wrd; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:40:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rd ( [65.6.194.9]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 67sm3391654wra.2006.01.27.06.40.11; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:40:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Russell Duffy" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Guru - single rotor Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:40:11 -0600 Message-ID: <007b01c6234f$93e0f560$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007C_01C6231D.49468560" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C6231D.49468560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > He will do single e-shafts but needs a minimum of ten to make it cost > effective 'economy of scale' etc. He is currently setting up for a 'single' dyno run. > He explained there are enormous torque reversals ( term?) in the > single rotor, so balancing is critical. The advice I posted previously > on balancing > is supported by Guru and the US experts. > Hope this helps some! > George ( down under) =20 Hi George, =20 I seem to be coming into this thread in the middle. Were there other = posts to flyrotary about this, or was this message cross posted from somewhere else? I saw the name Paul, so maybe it was posted "over there". =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C6231D.49468560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

> He will do single e-shafts but needs a minimum of = ten to=20 make it cost
> effective  'economy of scale' etc. He is = currently=20 setting up for a
'single' dyno run.
> He explained there are = enormous=20 torque reversals ( term?) in the
> single rotor, so balancing is = critical.=20 The advice I posted previously
> on
balancing
> is = supported by=20 Guru and the US experts.
> Hope this helps some!
> George ( = down=20 under)

 
Hi=20 George,
 
I seem = to be coming into=20 this thread in the middle.   Were there other posts to = flyrotary about=20 this, or was this message cross posted from somewhere else?  I saw = the name=20 Paul, so maybe it was posted "over there". 
 
Cheers,
Rusty




 ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C6231D.49468560--