Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.192; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au
Message-ID: <001c01c60b2d$906bde20$fcbaecdc@george>
From: "george lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-902517@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: ANOTHER wrong flexplate.
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:36:12 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bill,
The dish is 2mm deeper and the holes could be redrilled and it looks like
it's 320mm as well! Less mucking around by getting the right one. I will
check on an RX8 to confirm your suspicions.
George

> I have a flexplate that I suspect is an RX-8 unit, but I am not 100% sure.
>
>          Here is a picture.
>
>          It measures 1.350" from front to back surfaces. The bolt circle
> for the torque converter is about 10.25" (too big).
>
>          Bill Dube'
>
>
> At 12:33 AM 12/27/2005, you wrote:
>
> > > Again Thanks Bob,
> > >
> > > I would suggest you hang on to this one for yourself. The RX-8
flexplate
> > > won't work. (Ask me how I know.)
> >
> >Bill
> >I'm asking - is it the diameter or the depth or both.
> >I remember seeing the RX8 flexplate but can't recall what it looks like
> >exactly - got a photo and dimensions?
> >George (down under)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>