Return-Path: Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2572805 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:32:35 -0400 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.15d.2436f362 (4539) for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:32:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <15d.2436f362.2c8e87ab@aol.com> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:32:27 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Howe oil/water coolers are history To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 9/8/2003 4:10:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 13brv3@bellsouth.net writes: > I'm guessing that you've had occasion to try stock Mazda > coolers at some point. If so, how to they compare to these Setrabs? . I have never owned one. However, the stock cooler is good for about 250 HP. Last year the pole sitting RX-3 used the stock cooler without a problem. His ducting is very effective and the cooler is in the stock location on the bottom of the radiator. Lynn E. Hanover