Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #2820
From: David Leonard <Daveleonard@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: water flow restrictor
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 10:30:58 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message

Great find, Rusty.  That’s perfect.  If I find that it is too difficult to keep appropriate temps with just the cowl flap I will be getting one of those.

 

David Leonard

The Rotary Roster:

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy
Sent:
Saturday, September 06, 2003 7:12 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water flow restrictor

 

Although I would probably prefer to run a thermostat, my water pump housing lost the ability to house a thermostat when it got chopped down to size. 

 

 

Rusty 

------

 

 

Depending on how your pump housing was cut down, this might not be a good idea.  You'd have to make sure you always had flow, so perhaps a restrictor is a better idea.  The size of the restrictor will be trial and error, since it will be dependent on your radiator cooling capability.  I couldn't get the water temp over 130 without a thermostat, but my radiator is pretty huge, and obviously isn't absorbing any heat from the oil like it's supposed to. 

 

Rusty (again)

 

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster