X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.206] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 712588 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 08:26:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.206; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r4.1.) id q.fc.1ae50cbd (4592) for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:25:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:25:45 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cooler spark plugs To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1126009545" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5017 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1126009545 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/6/2005 7:40:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, sladerj@bellsouth.net writes: Buly & I are using BUR7EQ, BUR9EQ. My question was if there was a better plug for our application and if the SAG was less of of an issue with the 3rd gen plugs. John That was a typo. I don't use this kind of plug but it is certainly cold enough to race a NA engine on. Lynn E. Hanover -------------------------------1126009545 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 9/6/2005 7:40:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 sladerj@bellsouth.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size= =3D2>
Buly &&nbs= p;I are=20 using BUR7EQ, BUR9EQ. My question was if there was a better plug for=20= our=20 application and if the SAG was less of of an issue with the 3rd gen=20 plugs.
John
That was a typo. I don't use this kind of plug but it is certainly cold= =20 enough to race a NA engine on.
 
Lynn E. Hanover
-------------------------------1126009545--