X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.166] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 711884 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:31:38 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.166; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter05.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter05.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.72]) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CF33584A0 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.166]) by filter05.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter05.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.72]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29535-03-56 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (70-98-143-148.dsl1.csv.tn.frontiernet.net [70.98.143.148]) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0B235839B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <431C9D5B.3050607@frontiernet.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:32:43 -0500 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another great flying day = another day of troubleshooting References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0536-0, 09/05/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter05.roc.ny.frontiernet.net In any event, I read it as 36" of something at SL and 26" at 10k'. Don't know how to make more of anything at 10k out of that with the exception of pressure ratio which doesn't mean much to us. Jim S. Ed Anderson wrote: > Could be, but - I don't think so, Jim. > > Most of the time if you are talking "Hg boost you are talking absolute > pressure. If you are talking "psi" boost then you are generally > talking differential pressure "gauge" pressure(absolute - ambient = > gauge). 66" HG of manifold pressure at sea level = (66-30) = 36 "Hg > boost = 36/2 = approx 13 psi boost - that's a lot of boost for our > application! Dave would be producing considerably more HP than an NA > 13B. Something on the order of more than 260 HP! Hot Dog!! > > On the other hand, if his pressure was absolute of 36" then 36-30 = > 6"hg of boost or approx 3 psi or so. This would give Dave approx > 200HP instead of the 260HP or more that a 66" Hg figure would give. > > But, perhaps Dave is producing 260HP - however, that was not the > impression I got. > > Ed A > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sower" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 1:51 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another great flying day = another day of > troubleshooting > > >> If you're defining boost as over pressure, his SL pressure was 30" >> ambient + 36" boost 0 66" MAP and at 10k' he's got 26" ambient + 26" >> boost = 54" MAP >> I think he's talking 36" MAP at SL and 26" MAP at 10k. >> Either way, MAP at altitude is a LOT less ... Jim S. >> >> >> Ed Anderson wrote: >> >>> Well, actually it is absolute pressure that the spark plug is >>> reacting to. In this example, the absolute pressure in the intake >>> is 1.234" HG higher at 10,000 with your 26 " boost than at sea level >>> with your 36" of boost.. This would contribute to an increased >>> pressure in the combustion chamber when it is compressed over the >>> sea level compression pressure. Therefore, the spark plug is facing >>> a tougher task at 10,000 than at Sea level (in this example). >>> Ed >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* David Leonard >>> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft >>> >>> *Sent:* Monday, September 05, 2005 12:57 PM >>> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Another great flying day = another day >>> of troubleshooting >>> >>> Actually, Dave you had a higher pressure ratio (manifold >>> to ambient) at 10,000 feet with 26" boost than at sea >>> level with 36". At sea level the pressure ratio would be >>> 36/29.92 = 1.20. At 10,000 ft ambient pressure = 20.57 " >>> hg , so the pressure ratio would be 26/20.57 = 1.26. Not >>> much greater, but it was higher by approx.1.23" Hg. (1.20 >>> -1.26 = .06 *20.57 = 1.234" Hg). >>> >>> Ed A >>> >>> Right. But what does the plug know about the ambient pressure? I >>> thought that it was just the absolute density of the charge that >>> was contributing to SAG. >>> >>> -- Dave Leonard >>> Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY >>> http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html >>> http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >> > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > >