X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [202.52.32.26] (HELO venus3.veridas.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 681254 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:07:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=202.52.32.26; envelope-from=mburke@southernphone.com.au Received: (qmail 17910 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2005 16:06:16 +1000 Received: from dsl-202-52-51-019.nsw.veridas.net (HELO veridas) (202.52.51.19) by southernphone.com.au with SMTP; 25 Aug 2005 16:06:16 +1000 Message-ID: <000301c5a93a$f1937fa0$0401010a@veridas> From: "Michael Burke" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fire extinguishers Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:05:05 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Hi Larry, I was thinking of the new streamline cowls that has one large opening at the six o clock position. With the cooling rads slung under the engine, they can be ducted through to the exit cowl at the rear. My idea, (probably many ways to do it) would be to take the air for the engine compartment through an opening at the top of the duct just inside the duct inlet. This opening could then be controlled by a seperate flap, actuated from the cabin by a push/pull cable that can be locked in both positions. I would imagine this opening would not have to be very big, and if positioned properly should not interfere with air to the cooling rads. It would give one the ability to block inlet air to the engine without affecting the rads. The rads ducting would have to be pretty airtight as would the cowling around the spinner. That's the approach I'll be taking FWIW. Michael Burke. Australia. Larry, If you block both intake and outlet, the fire should die or be reduced to nothing. Fire extinguisher on top will put it down. On Aug 24, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Lawrence E Mac Donald wrote: As of yet, no one has come up with the notion of a lever (cable) operated set of doors that would block the air intakes of the cowling so that a fire extinguisher would work. Or is that a bad idea ? Larry Mac Donald Rochester N.Y. Do not archive On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:42:29 +1000 "Michael Burke" writes: the only way to keep the fire out is to keep the air out being able to shut the cooling air flow, at the exit or intake will help a lot. I'm trying to put this in perspective. Assuming no way to shut off the intake air, is firing a halon extinguisher in flight going to have ANY worthwhile impact on an engine fire? Keep in mind that the fibreglass cowl is likely to be breached early on, thus any control of airflow is lost. I'm beginning to think that the most important issues here are detection, and removal of the source (fuel) and that an extinguisher would be useful to save the plane once landed, but worthless (and wasted) if used while airborne. Thinking of fire makes me glad I built a pusher. John Yes John, early detection is vital so a heat sensor, naked flame detector is vital as is an ambient under cowl temp sensor. First one will detect the fire, and the second one will tell you how hot things are getting, and most important tell you when the fire has gone out. The very best strategy is in aircraft design. You need cowl flaps for BOTH inlet and air outlet points, so that you have total control of the airflow through the cowl. There are two main reasons for this. 1) If you can control the air flow, you CAN control the fire, you starve it. Believe me it works. Why do commercial kitchens have fire blankets. 2) When you fire off your halon extinguisher, you want to hold that cloud of halon under the cowl for as long as possible. If there is no air flow it ain't going any where fast, and secondly and most importantly as long as you have that halon cloud under the cowl, there is a very low probability of re-ignition. this can buy you very valuable time to find a safe landing area. Other design factors are, a decent size drip tray and hear barrier between the fuel rail and the exhaust port outlets. Don't allow fuel to drip or spray onto a hot exhaust. Second, shield the exhaust pipe/s from shooting a hot flame onto any fibreglass surface. Easier said than done I know, but if it can be done it should. Otherwise experiment with industrial fire proof matting on the inside surfaces of your cowl. An extinguisher that you can control, and that has enough reserve so that you can fire off 50% to 60% initially, and then two or three bursts three or four minutes apart. This tops up the level of halon under the cowl, and buys you very valuable time. Fires can be managed, but like everything else, its a lot easier if you design for them in the first place, and have a sound fire drill to put into action. Safe flying guys Michael Burke Australia -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/