X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with SMTP id 1009333 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:57:05 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABBMS6G3ALHRWWJ for (sender ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkOd1s+4cXawCINVY2J6smVcn/cZrxcAd2g== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KV2WLED6; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:55:49 PDT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:50:55 -0700 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EFI return fuel testing Message-ID: <20050621.125546.2344.4.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-2,8-9,12-22,24-65 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 23:11:4048035663 X-MAIL-INFO:2e1919ade40580905129c0ad60c05909b97dcdc0f4a414d1e4f4cd7df404f441fd2184c419c5ad9dad55e48559a9e0859005bd213de1543991243970b579a1b0e0d9710d24814d2ddd396169d044c4b5e0a00cb400ed958424459579b59d8d9170d010c901c990e0ad9001e5290159bdc0b0559d64d9d5c419645585d085ad61c4e485c04040f50030f5453054a9353539855951d980ade549757571f069e970211511a10d2145f5f5990d4dc1b4ed89258909 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com I did web queries, couldn't find anything that is friendly enough and fuel specific. So I've put such testing on my list of future activities. I'd like to experiment with all the various factors, then come up with some sort of interactive spreadsheet that allows you to do "what if" and predicts your safety margin. I was hoping to come up with multiple simple ways to predict. So the guy that doesn't have pressure sensor can still get measure of safety margin. Would be nice if someone volunteered to do spreadsheet ...that will be the tough part. I won't get around to it for a couple months. Too busy right now. -al wick Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:58:49 -0700 (PDT) George Graham writes: > > While running my ground testing, during the winters using auto > fuel. I used clear 3/8" tubing for fuel line, from my Facet > pump up to my carburetor. > > While the engine was producing power, I noticed bubbles in the > line, on the pressure side. Baffeled by how air could be > leaking > into a six psi line, I looked it over, and discovered that there > was a slight kink in the tubing. The bubbles were from the > small restriction in the pressure line (come to think of it, it > may have been a three psi pump, not six). > > Anyway, the bubbles really don't bother the Carter carb, with > a float, but, I wonder how much vapor bubbles are returned > from the EFI pressure regulator. It seems likely, that with > a 35 psi pressure drop, the vapor may be very significant. > > Certainly, someone on this list must have a setup capable of > testing the theory. All one would need would be a clear vessel > to return the fuel to, and perhaps suck fuel out of, with the > remaining system intact. Pump on, engine off would seem the > worst case. Cold weather auto fuel would be the most likely > to vaporize. > > Test results could contribute to safe fuel system design. > > > > George Graham > Mazda Rx7ez N4449E > Homepage > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >