X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1004838 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:00:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.165; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C29370193 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29821-11-28 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-78-176.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.78.176]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EC4370170 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <42B258A4.50203@frontiernet.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:59:16 -0500 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EFI Bleeder Circuit (Was Engine Not Starting) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0524-4, 06/16/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net I don’t see why Al W. should be held to a higher standard of specificity than you, or anyone else. It's HIS standard, not mine. I'm looking for him to practice what he preaches ... Jim S. Al Gietzen wrote: > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: EFI Bleeder Circuit (Was Engine Not Starting) > > al p wick wrote: (and Jim amended and inserted) > > I threw this together, it includes some assumptions, but I think it's > pretty close to reality. I strongly suspect what part of the FEMA > process is that? that the Egg fuel bleed system actually drops the > outlet pressure enough that the pump is able to move the small bubble > of air at the pump inlet. If you have a well designed system, what > exactly would that look like (or NOT look like) that air is displaced > automatically and there is no value to the bleed system. I tested my > plane and it definitely self primes. How exactly did you do that? > Which failure modes and what possible situations did you test for? The > Egg crash plane would not pump fuel hours after the vapor lock. Why > exactly? Are we sure they actually got to the bottom of it all? It was > not a self priming fuel design. > > Back to lurking, this my quota of posts for week. ;-) > > -al wick > > Jim; Lighten up. I don’t see why Al W. should be held to a higher > standard of specificity than you, or anyone else. > > Al G. > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >