Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #24012
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] re-drive question for Tracy
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:27:08 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
A separate system with ATF would work fine if you wanted to use a worse lubricant, add complexity, failure modes, weight, space requirements, and power consumption. 
 
Tracy
Tracy,

   Ian brough up a point that could also apply to the
re-drive.  Since the planet ass'y was originally designed
for lubrication with ATF, is there any particular reason
why it couldn't be run as a closed system with a "scavage"
pump circulating ATF, instead of using engine oil?

   Dunno if there's any advantage to the ATF, for that matter,
but I thought I'd ask.

Dale
(to whom the thought just occurred that this may have already
been discussed - some years ago - and could be in the
archives.)


> From: "Ian Dewhirst" <ianddsl@magma.ca>
> Date: 2005/06/16 Thu AM 10:52:04 EDT
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: turbo oil drain
>
> Hi Rusty, there is no rule that states that you have to use engine
> oil, since you already have a pump to scavenge and you really don't need
> much oil pressure for a turbo, add a small sump and a little cooler perhaps,
> and your worries of an engine oil leak are over.  The added advantage is
> that you can lubricate before start and cool after shutdown. 



>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster