Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.22.78; envelope-from=jbker@juno.com
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:32:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: re-drive question for Tracy
Message-ID: <20050616.173210.3416.23.JBKER@juno.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: WALTER B KERR <jbker@juno.com>


On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:16:02 -0400 Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net> writes:
> Umm, Georges,
> 
>    Neither Buly nor I are "RV guys".  I don't even own a 
> four wheel RV.  
> 
> Regards,                     
> Dale R.                              (___
> COZY MkIV-R13B #1254          |----==(___)==----|     
> Ch's 4, 5, 16 & 23 in progress      o/ | \o
> 
> 
> > From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" 
> <echolakeresort@telus.net>
> > Date: 2005/06/16 Thu PM 02:26:11 EDT
> > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: re-drive question for Tracy
> > 
> > You RV guys on one hand are always talking about saving weight and 
> safety
> > and on the other you are wanting to add gadgets that will 
> complicate
> > things(more possible failures) more weight and on ....are you not 
> looking
> > for trouble" 
-------------------------------

I agree Georges, this list has a lot of guys who seem to want to make the
system more complicated than necessary after picking the simplest ( and
most reliable IMHO Al ) power plant and then adding complications to the
weakest point in the system in all the subsytems to the power plant. Us
"RV" guys have enough problems to solve but nothing compared to those
guys scratch building airplanes out of molasses and bed sheets :>)

Bernie, one year to build plane and two years to get engine up and going
(a slow learner)