Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #23933
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pump mounting ( fuel system architecture)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:56:57 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Just another thought on this subject.  A common event in EFI cars that get driven to empty tanks is that the pump runs dry for some time and this can degrade its performance or ruin it.  It would then not prime unless force-fed some fuel because of the internal wear in the pump.  An orifice would help a worn pump to prime in this situation.
 
This may be why there is such a variation of results we hear on this list and elsewhere. 
 
The bleeder orifice may be OK but I would worry about the condition of the pump after an extended run-dry event.  I always switch the pump off immediately when this happens on my engine test stand.
 
This also jogs my memory about the variation of fuel pressure between the primary & backup pumps during tests with a blocked return.  I think it was Ed that mentioned this. 
 
Tracy

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:02:49 -0500 David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net>
writes:
> >
> I would be a little concerned about the pump being higher than the
> tank,
> given our recent discussions on vapor lock. Might work fine, but who
> knows..

> Dave
---------------------------------------

Hi Dave, I hear you, but unless I'm sucking air in a leak between the
tanks do not "think" it is a problem. You saw my comments about test
during the 40 hour flyoff and have not experienced any difficulty yet.
Not sure how high on the firewall that Ed's pumps are and know Tracy's
are on the floor.

Will be careful running tanks dry when I fly cross country to make sure
I'm with in gliding distance of an airstrip.

Bernie

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster