X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1002925 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:28:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.165; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC737070F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08072-01-35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-78-176.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.78.176]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF91370624 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <42B048F5.9020502@frontiernet.net> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:27:49 -0500 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pump mounting References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0524-2, 06/15/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net <... 'known solutions' list ...> That's better. Truth in advertising. "Best" is in the eye of the beholder (for openers) and there's no way to know when we've found it, "known solutions" is a much better choice of words. My nit for this week ... Jim S. Ernest Christley wrote: > Jim Sower wrote: > >> WHOSE best practices? Everyone flying has what seems to work for him. >> Which ones are you going to pick and which are you going to exclude >> (and why)? And folks will pick this attribute from this best practice >> and combine it with that attribute from that best practice ... and >> end up with ... ? >> Is this actually going to work? ... Jim S. >> > > Yes, Jim. It will. > > That is the beauty of the Wiki system. People with knowledge and add > to and extend it. I wouldn't give it the time of day, if there was a > Grand Poobah that had to annoint any additions with a holy EG/water > 50/50 ratio mix, I mean Evans RPG, or was that water wetter... > > But its not like that. The wiki lets you store what you know for me, > and what I know for you. If I post something stupid, you have the > ability to post a correction behind me. Megalomaniacs need not > apply. It's a collaborative knowledge storage mechanism. Let's get > away from a 'best practice' list and call it what it is. A 'known > solutions' list. >