X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from frontend3.cwpanama.net ([201.225.225.169] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 952849 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 22 May 2005 13:42:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.169; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend3.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with SMTP id 40802768 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 22 May 2005 12:45:26 -0500 Message-ID: <00c001c55ef5$8875ff00$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: The Rotary Powered Flyers Association Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:41:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C55ECB.9F5FB9B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C55ECB.9F5FB9B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know what was the personal experience of those who oppose PL's participation in a possible RPFA. Probably wasn't a nice experience, even less so involving your hobby/passion - no need to be put off in your hard earned free time..... BUT, consider, a) whatever his personal traits, he does have a wealth of experience and knowledge in lots of different areas. b) this RPFA would NOT be his personal newsletter ( where he is king, like it or not...), so he would have to "calm" down and be objective about things or risk ridicule, ...again. At this stage, I find it not very constructive to eliminate certain people because of some past disagreements, however unpleasant that was. Let him in (....if he wants to participate in the first place), lets see what he does and if he doesn't show professionalism and objectivity you always can "release" him from his "duty" to the Association. To close out people before even starting seems rather subjective and closed minded, .....just what some people here accuse PL to be. Don't use the same medicine or you are no better yourself ( ...not always easy to do, but it works) Remember the cause and goal of this Association to be - get all the knowledge there is, don't leave out a bit because of personal feelings. "Don't get caught in the quarrel, be above it!" Thomas Jakits Leonard, turn around AARP to RPAA - Rotary Powered Aviators Association ! :) ----- Original Message ----- From: John Slade To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 11:59 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: The Rotary Powered Flyers Association On a relative note, Jim S. voiced some concerns about PL's involvement in Paul's accident investigation... without finding and quoting his exact words, I second that concern. The chances of PL providing an objective and unbiased report on a plugs-up engine installation are about as great as us waking up to the liberals having something nice to say about George Bush tomorrow morning. Agreed. I'd go further. I would not wish to be involved in, or a member of, any organization in which he had ANY authority. By the way, in case you were inferring this - Paul's installation was not plugs up. John ------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C55ECB.9F5FB9B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't know what was the personal experience of = those who=20 oppose PL's participation in a possible RPFA.
Probably wasn't a nice experience, even less so = involving=20 your hobby/passion - no need to be put off in your hard earned free=20 time.....
 
BUT, consider,
a) whatever his personal traits, he does have a = wealth of=20 experience and knowledge in lots of different areas.
b) this RPFA would NOT be his personal = newsletter ( where=20 he is king, like it or not...), so he would have to "calm" down and = be=20 objective about things or risk ridicule, ...again.
 
At this stage, I find it not very constructive=20 to eliminate certain people because of some past disagreements, = however=20 unpleasant that was.
Let him in (....if he wants to participate in = the first=20 place), lets see what he does and if he doesn't show professionalism and = objectivity you always can "release" him from his "duty" to the=20 Association.
To close out people before even starting seems = rather=20 subjective and closed minded, .....just what some people here accuse PL = to=20 be.
Don't use the same medicine or you are no better = yourself=20 ( ...not always easy to do, but it works)
 
Remember the cause and goal of this Association = to be -=20 get all the knowledge there is, don't leave out a bit because of = personal=20 feelings.
"Don't get caught in the quarrel, be above=20 it!"
 
Thomas Jakits
 
Leonard, turn around AARP to RPAA - Rotary = Powered=20 Aviators Association ! :)
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 Slade
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 = 11:59 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: The = Rotary=20 Powered Flyers Association

On a relative note, Jim S. voiced = some concerns=20 about PL's involvement in
Paul's accident investigation... without = finding=20 and quoting his exact words,
I second that concern.  The = chances of PL=20 providing an objective and unbiased
report on a plugs-up engine=20 installation are about as great as us waking up to
the liberals = having=20 something nice to say about George Bush tomorrow=20 morning.

Agreed. = I'd go=20 further.

I would not wish to be involved in, = or a member=20 of, any organization in which he had ANY authority.

By the way, in case you were inferring this - = Paul's=20 installation was not plugs up.

John

------=_NextPart_000_00BC_01C55ECB.9F5FB9B0--