X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 952408 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 May 2005 21:05:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [192.168.0.10] (cpe-065-187-243-074.nc.res.rr.com [65.187.243.74]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j4M14n0V025915 for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 21:04:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <428FDAB1.3080705@nc.rr.com> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 21:04:49 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Quality Assurance / Peer Review ( was: Re: Seized 13b ...) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Jack Ford wrote: > > As far as the immediate safety issues are concerned, I would like to > see everybody's installation peer reviewed as extensively as possible. > I'll not fly, myself, until that happens with my system. > > Another two cents. > > Jack Ford I think that attitude will do more than anything else to formalize and get the organization off the ground. I hearby consign my self to status of 'Flightless Bird' until such time as a team of Rotary Experts have entered their corporate opinion about my rotary installation. (Note that I didn't necessarily agree to follow anyone's advice, but I won't fly until I get plenty). -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."