X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 951974 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:33:17 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.37; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050521153231.BLPK22430.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:32:31 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Quality Assurance / Peer Review ( was: Re: Seized 13b ...) Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:32:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050521153231.BLPK22430.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Jack, Although I agree with you in principle, I don't in the details. We have a number of very knowledgeable people in the group, who have not yet brought the fruits of their expertise into the air. That does not mean their observations won't be valid. Should more weight be given to the observations of those who are flying? In most cases, I would. Dale > From: "Jack Ford" > Date: 2005/05/21 Sat AM 10:39:30 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Seized 13b - accident prevention > > MessageI'd think that a formal organization might need to be in existence for an insurance company to take it seriously. > > This may be another step towards making alternative engine installations routine and safe (if there's such a thing as safe). A sort of self-policing association. > > Now that it's been brought up (Thanks, Al), I wouldn't think of making a first flight without some experienced eyeballs taking a close looksee at my "perfect" installation. It would be nice to know that the inspectors had at least flown successfully. > > My two cents. > > Jack Ford (Rank beginner) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Russell Duffy > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:26 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Seized 13b - accident prevention > > > Am I way off the mark here? Could/would this work? Are there others out there who would participate as "examiners"? Would you welcome such "look-over" on your project? Do you think it would do any good? I'd like some feedback on this, and then see whether it makes sense to pursue it any further. > > Hi Al, > > I think this is a noble effort, but I don't see that anything formal needs to be set up. I'd bet that anyone on this list would feel comfortable asking to see someone else's project, or asking to have someone look at theirs. > > Now if you could pitch this idea to the insurance companies, for a condition of first flight coverage, or cheaper rates, then you may be onto something. > > Cheers, > Rusty (balance gear has arrived) >