X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 951537 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:27:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm58aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050520222622.JRNN7916.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm58aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:26:22 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm58aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050520222621.VOLO25991.ibm58aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:26:21 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Seized 13b - accident prevention Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:26:41 -0500 Message-ID: <01a701c55d8a$feef68e0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01A8_01C55D61.161960E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01A8_01C55D61.161960E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am I way off the mark here? Could/would this work? Are there others = out there who would participate as "examiners"? Would you welcome such "look-over" on your project? Do you think it would do any good? I'd = like some feedback on this, and then see whether it makes sense to pursue it = any further.=20 =20 Hi Al, =20 I think this is a noble effort, but I don't see that anything formal = needs to be set up. I'd bet that anyone on this list would feel comfortable asking to see someone else's project, or asking to have someone look at theirs. =20 =20 Now if you could pitch this idea to the insurance companies, for a = condition of first flight coverage, or cheaper rates, then you may be onto = something.=20 =20 Cheers, Rusty (balance gear has arrived)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_01A8_01C55D61.161960E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Am I way = off the mark=20 here?  Could/would this work?  Are there others out there who = would=20 participate as “examiners”?  Would you welcome such = “look-over” on your=20 project?  Do you think it would do any good? I’d like some = feedback on=20 this, and then see whether it makes sense to pursue it any further. 
 
Hi=20 Al,
 
I = think this is a=20 noble effort, but I don't see that anything formal needs to be set=20 up.   I'd bet that anyone on this list would=20 feel comfortable asking to see someone else's project, = or asking=20 to have someone look at = theirs.  
 
Now if you could=20 pitch this idea to the insurance companies, for a condition of = first flight=20 coverage, or cheaper rates, then you may be onto=20 something. 
 
Cheers,
Rusty (balance=20 gear has arrived) 
------=_NextPart_000_01A8_01C55D61.161960E0--