Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #22184
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Intermediate housing ports/porting
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:48:16 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message

Has anyone ever joined the intermediate housing ports by removing some of the material between the ports in the housing to make a larger single port and runner? If so, did it help or adversely affect operation?

 
Hi Cary,
 
Funny you should ask, as I've been wondering about the very same thing.   You've no doubt heard me whining about how I believe my 40mm runners and TB barrels (primary and secondary combine in the cast intake, then one runner and barrel for each rotor) are likely too restrictive. 
 
In talking to TWM a while back, they suggested a balance tube from one runner to the other.  This would allow each rotor to draw air from both barrels of the TB.  They didn't know how well it would work, but saw it as the only way to get more effective TB area with my current intake.  In thinking about this, I came across the idea of simply milling out the divider between the primary ports inside the intake flange.  Unfortunately, I have the same question as you do as far as how well it will work.  
 
On one hand, it would have to give the engine easier access to air, but there is some concern about interference between the two rotor pulses.  I haven't really studied the intake and exhaust timing, but if there is any overlap between the intake of one rotor and the other, then I can see this being very bad.  
 
Imagine one rotor having it's intake cycle.  The port opens, there's a large rapid surge of suction pulling air into the rotor housing, but as it nears the end of the cycle, that suction subsides and the air is just more or less coasting in as the port starts to close.  Now, imagine the second rotor starting it's large suction portion of it's cycle as the first rotor is coasting.  The second rotor will be perfectly happy to suck some of the air and fuel out of the first rotor, as it also sucks new air in from the runners.  
 
I guess I need to study the timing, but ported engines would be worse.  Fortunately, the primary porting isn't usually quite the same as the secondary, so perhaps there's a better chance it can work.  I'm not quite ready to mill out that divider yet though.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty (too many experiments)   



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster