X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from SMTP03.INFOAVE.NET ([165.166.0.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 946727 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:28:59 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=165.166.0.28; envelope-from=Jewen@Comporium.net Received: from engineer1 ([206.74.87.186]) by SMTP00.InfoAve.Net (PMDF V6.2-X31 #30986) with SMTP id <01LOC9MKC7AU9CEIET@SMTP00.InfoAve.Net> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:27:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:26:05 -0400 From: Joe Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Atkins Intake To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <004201c55a7f$65b82300$6532a8c0@engineer1> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C55A5D.DE588A10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C55A5D.DE588A10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageRusty, Thanks for your opinion. Since your byline says you may need a Renesis = intake - I was wondering if you know if the bolt and/or port patterns = are different on a 4 port Renesis than other 4 port 13B engines? Joe (Trying to think of something witty to put here) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:21 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Atkins Intake Does anyone have experience or an opinion of the Atkins side draft = intake manifold. I am considering using this with a TWM throttle body. Hi Joe,=20 It will certainly work, but it's not optimum by any means. It's sort = of a one-size-fits-all approach, which just leaves a port big enough to = cover a 4 port, or 6 port housing. It's probably better for a 6 port = than a 4 IMO. I've tested one, and it worked fairly well. Ed's tried = one in the past, and Paul is using one now. Perhaps there are others. = Cheers, Rusty (may need a Renesis intake now) ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C55A5D.DE588A10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Rusty,
 
Thanks for your opinion.  Since = your byline=20 says you may need a Renesis intake - I was wondering if you know if the = bolt=20 and/or port patterns are different on a 4 port Renesis than = other 4=20 port 13B engines?
 
Joe (Trying to think of something witty = to put=20 here)
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:21 = PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Atkins = Intake

Does anyone have=20 experience or an opinion of the Atkins side draft intake = manifold.  I am=20 considering using this with a TWM throttle body.
 
 
Hi=20 Joe, 
 
It will=20 certainly work, but it's not optimum by any means.  It's=20 sort of a one-size-fits-all approach, = which just=20 leaves a port big enough to cover a 4 port, or 6 port housing.  = It's=20 probably better for a 6 port than a 4 IMO.   = I've = tested one,=20 and it worked fairly well.  Ed's tried one in the past, and = Paul is=20 using one now.  Perhaps there are=20 others.   
 
Cheers,
Rusty (may=20 need a Renesis intake = now)
------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C55A5D.DE588A10--