Message

X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 946718 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:21:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm57aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050517012104.RCJT12557.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm57aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:21:04 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm57aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050517012103.PSCY23538.ibm57aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:21:03 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Atkins Intake Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:21:09 -0500 Message-ID: <000501c55a7e$b4adb7f0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C55A54.CBD7AFF0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C55A54.CBD7AFF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anyone have experience or an opinion of the Atkins side draft = intake manifold. I am considering using this with a TWM throttle body. =20 =20 Hi Joe,=20 =20 It will certainly work, but it's not optimum by any means. It's sort of = a one-size-fits-all approach, which just leaves a port big enough to cover = a 4 port, or 6 port housing. It's probably better for a 6 port than a 4 = IMO. I've tested one, and it worked fairly well. Ed's tried one in the past, = and Paul is using one now. Perhaps there are others. =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty (may need a Renesis intake now) ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C55A54.CBD7AFF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Does anyone have = experience or=20 an opinion of the Atkins side draft intake manifold. I am = considering=20 using this with a TWM throttle body.

Hi=20 Joe,

It will=20 certainly work, but it's not optimum by any means. It's=20 sort of a one-size-fits-all approach, = which just=20 leaves a port big enough to cover a 4 port, or 6 port housing. = It's=20 probably better for a 6 port than a 4 IMO. = I've = tested one,=20 and it worked fairly well. Ed's tried one in the past, and = Paul is=20 using one now. Perhaps there are=20 others.

Cheers,

Rusty (may=20 need a Renesis intake now)

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C55A54.CBD7AFF0--