X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 945977 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:34:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-189-178.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.189.178]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j4GIXw0W015070 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:33:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <022b01c55a45$d3f43f50$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Muffler was [FlyRotary] Re: Prop balancing? Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:34:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine > ------------------------------------------------- > > Gee, I thought Tracy said it was a big mistake he thought when he went > without splitters on #2 engine in Otter. > > Just ran some ground test with the diffuser and ran about the same temps > as before, but 10 degree higher ambient temp. The oil temp ran hotter > than the previous test , so I assume there was some goodness during > ground operation. Ran 30 minutes both test, will post some results later. > > Bernie, mounting the diffuser for flight > If you are getting the same temps with the ambient 10F higher, then looks like its doing some good. Will be interesting to see how it does in the air. Ed A