X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 934296 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:56:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-189-178.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.189.178]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j462uAL5010075 for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 22:56:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001101c551e7$2d1ce210$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Static MAP readings? Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 22:56:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01C551C5.A5BC85D0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C551C5.A5BC85D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageDon't bother checking the tach. I have a prop tach and it says = the engine tach is correct - sorry 'bout that. But, it was a 60F day so = the denser air help - there! feel better {:>)? My prop is 74 x 88, = beginning to wonder if I should have left it at 76 (the devil made me = say that Rusty). Actually, I would rather make an entire intake manifold that build = another fiberglass duct {:>). ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:39 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Static MAP readings? " I've measured mine a number of times, and I recall that they're = essentially 1-5/8, which of course works out to about 41mm. The TWM = site only lists 40 and 42 for the 2900 series, so I'm not sure exactly = which one I have. " -------------------------------- OK, in the above quote, what I meant was- they don't list a 41mm, only = a 40mm and a 42mm. For the record, I know they make larger sizes (so = quit telling me ). =20 Actually, I do have a 44mm TWM with 4 injectors, but the bolt pattern = and runner spacing is different, and it wouldn't help, because my = runners are the same size as my current TB. =20 I'm going to have to do something about this, because Ed is kicking my = ass with his numbers (assuming Clark isn't playing a practical joke on = me when he said he reduced my prop from 74x88 to 74x80). I figure I can = either make a new intake, and get more power, or send a goon squad out = after Ed on night to keep him quiet. Now, I really do like Ed, but I = also hate the thought of making a new intake :-) =20 Cheers, Rusty (planning to check Ed's tach) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C551C5.A5BC85D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Don't bother checking the tach.  I = have a prop=20 tach and it says the engine tach is correct - sorry 'bout that.  = But, it=20 was a 60F day so the denser air help - there! feel better {:>)?  = My prop=20 is 74 x 88, beginning to wonder if I should have left it at 76 (the = devil made=20 me say that Rusty).
 
Actually, I would rather make an entire = intake=20 manifold that build another fiberglass duct {:>).
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 = 9:39=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Static = MAP=20 readings?

 " I've measured=20 mine a number of times, and I recall that they're essentially 1-5/8, = which=20 of course works out to about 41mm.  The TWM site only = lists 40=20 and 42 for the 2900 series, so I'm not sure exactly which one I = have. "
--------------------------------=
 
OK, in the above quote, what I meant was- = they don't=20 list a 41mm, only a 40mm and a 42mm.   For the record, = I know=20 they make larger sizes (so quit telling me <g>). =20
 
Actually, I do have a 44mm TWM with 4 = injectors, but=20 the bolt pattern and runner spacing is different, and it wouldn't = help,=20 because my runners are the same size as my current TB. =20
 
I'm going to have to do something about = this, because=20 Ed is kicking my ass with his numbers (assuming Clark isn't playing a=20 practical joke on me when he said he reduced my prop from 74x88 to=20 74x80).  I figure I can either make a new intake, and get more = power,=20 or send a goon squad out after Ed on night to keep him = quiet.  Now,=20 I really do like Ed, but I also hate the thought of making a new = intake=20 :-) 
 
Cheers,
Rusty (planning to check Ed's=20 tach)
 
 
    
 
 
 
= ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C551C5.A5BC85D0--