X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 934221 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 May 2005 21:39:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050506013858.QDWJ2470.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 21:38:58 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Static MAP readings? Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:39:17 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c551dc$6acf9090$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C551B2.81F98890" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C551B2.81F98890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable " I've measured mine a number of times, and I recall that they're essentially 1-5/8, which of course works out to about 41mm. The TWM = site only lists 40 and 42 for the 2900 series, so I'm not sure exactly which = one I have. " -------------------------------- =20 OK, in the above quote, what I meant was- they don't list a 41mm, only a 40mm and a 42mm. For the record, I know they make larger sizes (so = quit telling me ). =20 =20 Actually, I do have a 44mm TWM with 4 injectors, but the bolt pattern = and runner spacing is different, and it wouldn't help, because my runners = are the same size as my current TB. =20 =20 I'm going to have to do something about this, because Ed is kicking my = ass with his numbers (assuming Clark isn't playing a practical joke on me = when he said he reduced my prop from 74x88 to 74x80). I figure I can either = make a new intake, and get more power, or send a goon squad out after Ed on = night to keep him quiet. Now, I really do like Ed, but I also hate the = thought of making a new intake :-) =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty (planning to check Ed's tach) =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C551B2.81F98890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 " I've measured=20 mine a number of times, and I recall that they're essentially 1-5/8, = which=20 of course works out to about 41mm.  The TWM site only = lists 40=20 and 42 for the 2900 series, so I'm not sure exactly which one I = have. "
--------------------------------=
 
OK, in the above quote, what I meant was- = they don't=20 list a 41mm, only a 40mm and a 42mm.   For the record, I = know=20 they make larger sizes (so quit telling me <g>). =20
 
Actually, I do have a 44mm TWM with 4 = injectors, but=20 the bolt pattern and runner spacing is different, and it wouldn't help, = because=20 my runners are the same size as my current TB.  =
 
I'm going to have to do something about this, = because=20 Ed is kicking my ass with his numbers (assuming Clark isn't playing a = practical=20 joke on me when he said he reduced my prop from 74x88 to 74x80).  I = figure=20 I can either make a new intake, and get more power, or send a goon = squad=20 out after Ed on night to keep him quiet.  Now, I really do like Ed, = but I=20 also hate the thought of making a new intake :-)  =
 
Cheers,
Rusty (planning to check Ed's = tach)
 
 
    
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C551B2.81F98890--