Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <427917E0.3010308@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:43:44 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Circuit breaker article
References: <list-932444@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-932444@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Mark R Steitle wrote:

> Hi Al,
>
> That was my impression too. Did you read the reader feedback at the 
> bottom? One reader wrote that his company policy says not to reset a 
> tripped breaker… not even once. So, why have breakers if you don’t 
> reset them? Interesting, for sure.
>
> Mark
>
To be fair, from the article it appears that the breakers were designed 
to be used, originally. But then it turned out that Kapton insulation 
wasn't such a great thing after all. New policy to deal with new 
information.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |