X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <wes147@yahoo.com>
Received: from web31702.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.182] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5)
  with SMTP id 931956 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 May 2005 23:30:55 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.182; envelope-from=wes147@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 51014 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2005 03:30:09 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=NfFeTu07+p/JLn98dI6RGb+tmBibk3uQEUTNntAFfVwSrVhnRg8M1hyt907Rb+gQ0bjRStE8keco2rz2j7ALG/MVH5aP9loWYSO0bctS831U9mFLkpBn43tmomMY22Y6ByyORYqJnRwg0a51LnvwQZwbTM/vk/YkxufYT5PiHy4=  ;
Message-ID: <20050504033009.51012.qmail@web31702.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [4.254.209.101] by web31702.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 May 2005 20:30:09 PDT
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 20:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: William Eslick <wes147@yahoo.com>
Subject: static map readings
To: Flyrotary List <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1579092477-1115177409=:50078"

--0-1579092477-1115177409=:50078
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Rusty,
 
Call me crazy, but mine has always read the same as shutdown (ambient) when I go to WOT.  My pickup is in the top of the stock lower half of the manifold.  I have always taken this to mean no measurable loss through the 3-inch scat tube and large K & N filter.
 
Does anyone else have similar experience??
 
Bill Eslick (wishing I were not in Omaha)
 
I'm still a bit concerned about the static MAP readings that I'm getting.   This isn't something that just happened, but rather has been going on for at least the life of this particular intake setup.  At on point, I was almost convinced that the TWM TB ports were just not providing an accurate reading, but now I'm almost convinced that they are.  Has anyone measured MAP at WOT static?  


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--0-1579092477-1115177409=:50078
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000bf>Rusty,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf>Call me crazy, but mine has always read the same as shutdown (ambient) when I go to WOT.&nbsp; My pickup is in the top of the stock lower half of the manifold.&nbsp; I have always taken this to mean no measurable loss through the 3-inch scat tube and large K &amp; N filter.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf>Does anyone else have similar experience??</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT color=#0000bf>Bill Eslick (wishing I were not in Omaha)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT face=Arial></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=657562714-03052005><FONT face=Arial>I'm still a bit concerned about the static MAP readings that I'm getting.&nbsp;&nbsp; This isn't something that just happened, but rather has been going on for at least the life of this particular intake setup.&nbsp; At on point, I was almost convinced that the TWM TB ports were just not providing an accurate reading, but now I'm almost convinced that they are.&nbsp; <FONT color=#ff0000>Has anyone measured MAP at WOT static?&nbsp; </FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com 
--0-1579092477-1115177409=:50078--