Return-Path: Received: from access.aic-fl.com ([204.49.76.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 881145 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:40:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.49.76.2; envelope-from=unicorn@gdsys.net Received: from b9k4u9 (unverified [204.49.76.98]) by access.aic-fl.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with SMTP id for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:39:05 -0500 Message-ID: <001601c543a6$f9edf1c0$624c31cc@b9k4u9> From: "Richard Sohn" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New rotors, New housings Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:41:18 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 I think the whole thing went away, since it is now .09mm, which is .00354". when the dimension was first reported it was .009mm. Hope this strightens this out. Richard Sohn N-2071U ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Rogers" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 1:39 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New rotors, New housings > Richard, > > Could you restate that in another format? What I'm seeing > is either darned near 3/8 of a inch or "four Tenths" > (.000354") - neither of which seems applicable. > 3.54 thousandTHs (.00354) seems more likely. > > Regards, (__ > Dale R. |----==(__)==----| > COZY MkIV-R13B #1254 o/ \o > Ch's 4, 5, 16 & 23 in progress > > >> From: "Richard Sohn" >> Date: 2005/04/17 Sun PM 03:50:51 EDT >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New rotors, New housings >> >> Kelly, >> >> it is more like .354 thousands here in the 48. Would want to make the >> seals to slopy. >> >> Richard Sohn >> N-2071U >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Kelly Troyer >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 7:51 AM >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New rotors, New housings >> >> -------------- Original message from keltro@att.net (Kelly >> Troyer): -------------- >> >> >> Georges, >> Are these numbers in reference to the apex seal slot taper from >> the bottom of slot (2.017 mm) to the top of slot (2.026 mm) which >> is a taper of (.009 mm) or about 3.54 thousands here in the 48 ?? >> -- >> Kelly Troyer >> Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html