X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: #####\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.53\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 871539 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:39:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38.7.) id q.c.42ff6a44 (3940) for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:39:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:39:08 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: V shape Apex Seal Slots? To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 04/15/2005 05:26 Central Daylight Time, lendich@optusnet.com.au writes: << Lynn, Good info on balancing the two rotors. Does the rotor have to balanced within itself for a best balancing outcome. I'm doing a 'single rotor' and was wondering if I need to go that far. George ( down under) >> The rotors are balanced dynamically (spin balanced) from the factory and then hand selected into sets that weigh the same within a few grams. Notice some balance marks on all but one corner (generally). If you have not machined anything off of the rotor, it will still be dynamically balanced, and need no further attention. In the single rotor, the whole rig is going to be dynamically balanced, so the two counter weights will equal the weight of the rotor exactly. There may be some not obvious tricks like misbalancing to account for power pulses or similar. Check with another builder so as not to reinvent the wheel on that. Paul Yaw, Richard Sohn or Dave Adkins come to mind. Lynn E. Hanover