X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: \eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 870920 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:14:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.32; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050415161317.THPK13104.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:13:17 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Used engine price (was: Re: V shape Apex Seal Slots?) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:13:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050415161317.THPK13104.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Jim, I'm sure it varies by location in the country, but in the PHX area, $400 for a running engine is about par. $250 for an unknown core seems a little high, but maybe not, if you get *everything*. I paid $200 for my first block, but it was missing the secondary injectors, flywheel and even the counterweight. They didn't even leave the big nut. Dale R. > From: Jim Sower > Date: 2005/04/15 Fri AM 09:41:18 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: V shape Apex Seal Slots? > > Lee, > This would seem to indicate that if one discovered "tapered" slots > before the seal came out and ate up the engine he could cut them out to > 3 mm and give the rotor a whole new life. > Does that make sense? ... Jim S. > PS For '88 and '89 NA engines, how does $400 for a running engine and > $250 for a core sound? > > Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > > >In a message dated 04/15/2005 1:44:52 AM Central Daylight Time, > >lendich@optusnet.com.au writes: > > > >The slot is perfectly straight. No taper at all. If you stand a new or near > >new apex seal on end in the slot, the exposed end should not move more than > >(about) 3/16" total. New slot and new seal gives nearly no movement. The 3/16" > >would be end of life span. > > > >For aircraft use, new or nearly new is the way to go. > > > >You can take engines apart that have been running fine, and the apex seals > >are just about to fall out of the slots they are so short. The slots can wear > >into obvious "V" shapes, and the engine is still running fine. My wife's RX-3 > >did that. I was just sitting at a stop sign one day and whack!! A seal came out > >of what was left of a big "V" slot and the rotor crushed it against the > >housing. There was no chrome left on the rotor housings. Big grooves in the irons. > >The only piece I could use was the crank. > >The whole thing was scrap. > > > >The rotors are made of cast steel. You can weld on them. I have TIGed holes > >shut and built up gouges and smoothed them off. Again not for aircraft but for > >a dune buggy or any non critical application, I see no reason for scrapping a > >piece I can fix quickly. > > > >I grew up during W.W.II and you were literally not allowed to throw anything > >away. So I don't (until recently). > > > >Lynn E. Hanover > > > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >