X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTPS id 870110 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:44:32 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.133.165; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-205-162.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.205.162]) by mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j3F6hgr2022451 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:43:43 +1000 Message-ID: <00a201c54186$fbf6dd50$a2cdecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: V shape Apex Seal Slots? Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:47:24 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Ed, I gave my response in clearances ( as per the manual) I don't know if the apex seals vary slightly or not - I assume they do, but even if the groove is even ( Top to Bottom ) too much slop is a problem. George( down under) > On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:26:19 -0500, Russell Duffy wrote: > > Apex Location Base Top > > > > > > Seal1 1.99mm 2.16 - 2.26mm Seal2 > > 1.98mm 2.22 - 2.25mm Seal3 > > 1.98mm 2.18 - 2.20mm Clearly the slot is larger at > > the top - is this due to design or is this due to wear? Lynn??? > > Anybody? Hi Ed, I still have the brand new rotor that was > > dropped by the ceramic coaters, and I just measured the two un- > > smashed apex seal slots. I also measured the slots on the dead > > rotor that was involved in my oil out adventure. All the slots > > measure 1.89mm, with no sign of being larger at the top of the slot > > than the bottom. Cheers, Rusty (my kingdom for a decent > > contractor) > > > Just for the record, how did you guys measure those slots to this degree of > accuracy? > What tools were used? Were the slots absolutely spotless? > > Jim Brewer > > Jim, I used $19 digital readout calipers - great tools and reasonably > accurate. The rotor slots were reasonably clean and I did scrap the small > amount of carbon away. In any case, if there were carbon deposites at the > top of the slots they would have resulted in a smaller not larger gap than > the bottom. > > If had had to have only one "precision" measuring tool, it would be one of > those $19.00 digtal calipers. > > Ed > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >