Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 813205 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:11:07 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C06358094 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167]) by filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16312-08-10 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-85-150.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.85.150]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C093580FB for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <423E5741.8060101@frontiernet.net> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:10:25 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: BMW and EWP References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0511-1, 03/17/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Sorry I missed them William wrote: > I have published the measured curve as a function of pump rpm several > times. > Bill Schertz > KIS Cruiser # 4045 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jim Sower > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Sent:* Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:40 PM > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: BMW and EWP > > > Does anyone *actually know* what the flow through a rotary is with > EDWP? I mean, like *measured* (the other list can be relied upon > to /calculate/ stuff). Just as important, does anyone *actually > know* how far open/closed a thermostat is in our applications. I > know some folks don't have thermostats installed. Is it possible > that EDWP might be circulating coolant so fast it doesn't have > time to cool off much in the radiator or heat up much in the > block? That the same system would work as well at lower flow? Or > something like that? >