Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 813197 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:10:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E632358271 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167]) by filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03111-07-96 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-85-150.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.85.150]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E763581D9 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <423E5706.2040702@frontiernet.net> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:09:26 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: BMW and EWP References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0511-1, 03/17/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net <... really want a good alternator and backup ...> You got THAT right. What with fuel pumps, injectors, ignition and now two water pumps, we will need the stoutest electrical system in all Christiandom. Has anyone inquired of D-C about a dirt simple check valve option on the pump? ... Jim S. WRJJRS@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 3/20/2005 12:41:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, > canarder@frontiernet.net writes: > > The other list is forever making pronouncements about what will or > will not work. Their math is *impeccable*. The premises they > operate from are *not* Is it not possible that we are overlooking > or underemphasizing some important factor? That the hybrid (EWP > /and/ EDWP) systems we have online now are distorting the data? > Leon's experience cannot ignore any of the factors. Our estimates > can ignore as many as we want to (or are unaware of). I can't > help but think that a little morel hard data gathered from a > purely EWP system will put a lot of the controversy to rest. > > A /flawless/ line of reasoning, based on a /false premise/ leads > us /right through the lookin' glass/ ... > Jim S. > > Jim, The False Premise comment seems to be spot on. Davies Craig > mentions that the Ferrari 365 ALMS American Le Mans Series winner were > using 2 EWP's in series per the Davies Craig site suggested method. I > have been as skeptical as any about the EWP but is seems to be being > used to great success. I think I will be planning for the use of 2, > main and overtemp. I will really want a good alternator and backup system! > Bill Jepson