Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.39; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:18:51 -0700
From: Bob White <rlwhite@comcast.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: BMW and EWP
Message-Id: <20050320181851.6efad29e.rlwhite@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-812801@logan.com>
References: <list-812801@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Al,

Could you say a few words about how you determined what the optimum flow
requirements for aircraft use shoud be.  If it's in the archives, just
a pointer to the message(s) would be enough.  That's one of the factors
I would like to understand better before firing up my nice new engine
with a low flow cooling system.

Bob W.


On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:30:39 -0800
"Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net> wrote:


> I have reported here 3 or 4 times before that I have measured the flow
> through my engine and the dyno cooling loop provided by the engine driven
> pump; and it correlates quite well with what I calculated the flow
> requirements to be for something near optimum for aircraft use.
> 

-- 
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)