Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #18896
From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric water pump
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:42:54 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Russell Duffy wrote:

    Another point that I'd like to bring up right now is hose sizes. I often hear the statement that a car is only run on 30% power on average and yet the auto manufactures use a minimum of 1 1/4" hoses for coolant. But in our airplanes builders commonly use much smaller hoses & fittings usually in order to use AN fittings of which I believe AN16 is the largest (correct me if I'm wrong) and is only 3/4". I don't understand this reasoning. I used 1 1/4" hoses up to the "T" where the rads are plumbed in parallel, where I step it down to 2 -1"hoses. Even the "T's" were made with minimum restriction in mind. If we have a higher power demand from the engine (which is always used as a reason not to use EWP's), then why restrict it's coolant flow?
 
 Hi Todd,
 
If I'm not mistaken, Tracy is using 3/4" hoses???  I've been using AN12 hoses, with two evap cores in series, and there has never been a question of cooling the water on the RV-3, even in severe climb tests.  The antique mechanical pump does have a lot of muscle, and might be making up for it though, and I still haven't found a way to test the EWP by itself in flight.
 
Cheers,
Rusty (wondering where my font appeared)    

Local glitch. As I type, I get your font but in blue. When I got the message back from the list server, it was my normal drab black font. I'm pretty sure it's Bill Gates' fault.

Charlie
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster