Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 792254 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:23:17 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.64; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.160.152] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DAoad-0000Ri-GA for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:22:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=YMHjQGSZAXDCZF/QbBRQq9ptBs0bQI9M5OrzgwyOnI1+hreSy8gSTAzZJBIr2bpr; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:23:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: peripheral ports Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--648160586 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79cb810f3c96055a828e094e39f3cdc17c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.160.152 --Apple-Mail-2--648160586 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Problem is there is no problem with the idle. Time to quit referring=20= to bogus problems with the p ports. Jerry On Sunday, March 13, 2005, at 05:58 PM, jesse farr wrote: > Years ago, I was buying something from some feller and he was kind of=20= > high.=A0 When I asked for a little better deal and said I was used to=20= > buying 'em from this other fellow for a lot less but he was out; he=20 > told me real quick=A0like that he could even sell 'em cheaper=A0than = the=20 > other fellow when he didn't have 'em either.=A0 I guess price is not=20= > something to even gripe about if you can't get 'em.=A0 And, I will = admit=20 > that the price might not seem too bad when/if you need housings=20 > anyway. Oh well, I 'll just stay happy with my junker, as long as it=20= > lasts; then I can worry about some of that kind of stuff. But, let's=20= > face it, if the pp engines don't keep running at low rpms and/or idle=20= > well, even though their high rpms can be=A0right down our aircraft use=20= > alley with proper psru gearing, they will not be much good to us; it=20= > seems aircraft actually=A0do have to have an engine that keeps running=20= > on/in slow flight, too. > =A0 > jofarr, soddy tn > > ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul > =A0 > I wouldn't mind spending $5000.00 to knock 50 pounds off my engine=20 > weight.=A0I could then take out the 25 pounds of noseweitht, knocking=20= > a=A0total of 75 pounds off of my 1150 pound canard. =A0I saved so much = by=20 > using a "junk yard engine" in the first place, I'd still be way ahead=20= > of a Lycoming.=A0 However, I guess it doesen't matter how much they = cost=20 > if they are not available.=A0 Paul Conner > --Apple-Mail-2--648160586 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Problem is there is no problem with the idle. Time to quit referring to bogus problems with the p ports. Jerry On Sunday, March 13, 2005, at 05:58 PM, jesse farr wrote: ArialYears ago, I was buying something from some feller and he was kind of high.=A0 When I asked for a little better deal and said I was used to buying 'em from this other fellow for a lot less but he was out; he told me real quick=A0like that he could even sell 'em cheaper=A0than the other fellow when he didn't have 'em either.=A0 I guess price is not something to even gripe about if you can't get 'em.=A0 And, I will admit that the price might not seem too bad when/if you need housings anyway. Oh well, I 'll just stay happy with my junker, as long as it lasts; then I can worry about some of that kind of stuff. But, let's face it, if the pp engines don't keep running at low rpms and/or idle well, even though their high rpms can be=A0right down our aircraft use alley with proper psru gearing, they will not be much good to us; it seems aircraft actually=A0do have to have an engine that keeps running on/in slow flight, too. =A0 Arialjofarr, soddy = tn ----- Original Message ----- From: 1999,1999,FFFFPaul =A0 I wouldn't mind spending $5000.00 to knock 50 pounds off my engine weight.=A0I could then take out the 25 pounds of noseweitht, knocking a=A0total of 75 pounds off of my 1150 pound canard. =A0I saved so much = by using a "junk yard engine" in the first place, I'd still be way ahead of a Lycoming.=A0 However, I guess it doesen't matter how much they cost if they are not available.=A0 Paul Conner = --Apple-Mail-2--648160586--