Message-ID: <003501c32b66$c76bdfa0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2402844@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Light weigh intake system
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:31:32 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:35 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Light weigh intake system


>
>     Not quite certain what you mean by "intake flange", but presume you
are
> referring to the aluminum intake manifold casting (since that is what is
> sitting on the table),
> -------------
>
> ===>  Correct, first try too :-)
>
> Where did that casting come from, and what's the meaning of that turbo
> exhaust manifold :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty
>


This is the manifold that Paul Lamar had cast.  He sells it for $175
including shipping.  Yes, you sharp-eyed devil, that is a 91 turbo exhaust
manifold you see next to it.  I am moving toward a turbo installation as
well, but first had to clean up the intake manifold which had the secondary
injectors down a few inches from the exhaust system and weighed a lot - like
21 lbs.  I committed to no net weight increase with the turbo, so I need to
get rid of approx 35 lbs of weight before installing it.

I am planning on elminating one of my two batteries (for 15 lbs) and perhaps
elminating the mufflers (15 lbs).  If I got rid of my 9 lbs smog/vacuum pump
as well, I would be within my weight criteria.  Plus I've lost 20 lbs (the
cheaper modification {:>)).

Ed