Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth05.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 770082 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:22:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.160.83] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth05.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7FYF-0001Fj-OK for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:21:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=IDrG08PlYZ8hZctKo4/StwMjbcTXGK9C2AnoIKHcLW1J/AEKglMEoXjr9pmFugBA; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:22:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <990A2308-8CC9-11D9-A371-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec799cb385c990aae1647f4d09c65c6b1615350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.160.83 Ah So, You can count on me to need the obvious clarified. Jerry On Friday, March 4, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Finn Lassen wrote: > EDWP: Engine Driven Water Pump > as compared to > EWP: Electric Water Pump > > (those dammed engineers and their abbreviations :) > Finn > > Jerry Hey wrote: > >> What does the "D" in EDWP stand for? Jerry >> >> >>> Bulent Aliev wrote: >>> >>>> Most of the people are trying to find solutions to non-existent >>>> problems. >>> >>> >>> Power. We pay good money all over the place the get a few extra >>> horses, or a little less drag. Real world dyno test are showing up >>> to 9Hp gains with the EWP, with most of the gains at high RPM (where >>> we're at). >>> >>> Weight. We pay good money all over the place to loose a few ounces. >>> The EWP will save POUNDS. >>> >>> Balance. I consider lead in my tailpost a problem. >>> >>> Configuration. The EDWP just doesn't fit well in a lot of cases. >>> >>> Reliability. Belts are very reliable, IFF installed properly. Very >>> few of us have factory jigs to verify 100% accurate installation. >>> The EWP makes a backup pump easy. >>> >>>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>> >> > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >