Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 769899 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:31:17 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2005 09:45:56 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,134,1107752400"; d="scan'208"; a="39267568:sNHT18668776" Received: from [172.18.179.180] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.180]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j24EUUjI011905 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:30:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42287106.3050303@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:30:30 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Test Results/DRAG References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Russell Duffy wrote: > > Does this change in viscosity actually translate into an equal change > in flow rate? If so, you have to wonder if anyone has tested the > EWP's at normal engine temps. That guy, Poiseuille, says that it does. He actually went through the bother of writing a scientific 'law' to try to enforce it. But what does he know. From the sound of his name, he's probably French. Ernest (considering some Freedom Fries for lunch)