Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com ([64.136.20.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with SMTP id 769778 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 07:31:32 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.20.164; envelope-from=jbker@juno.com Received: from outbound21-sr.nyc.untd.com (webmail22.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.162]) by smtpout02.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABBCSXG4A6XGCE2 for (sender ); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:30:18 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: Y+Mfppm2QyGfnY/dq+iW1QtIpt0SToPepS88O1bhIvgtE8Pv7U3S+Q== Received: (from jbker@juno.com) by webmail22.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KL9FRTHA; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:30:02 PST Received: from [4.234.90.53] by webmail22.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:29:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [4.234.90.53] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jbker@juno.com" Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:29:02 GMT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EWP (BS) X-Mailer: WebMail Version 2.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20050304.043002.22021.30105@webmail22.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 2:3:4087162207 Buly wrote: Tracy can fly for years and beat everybody without EWP, but few feel they must do better :) Just finish the ....airplanes. ------------------------------------------------ Well, I agree with both Rusty and Buly. If you wish to primarily fly, do like Van and only use proven methods, but if you believe you know how to make "good" BETTER, than go for it. After spinning my wheels with all the time I put in my intake system, I would duplicate more of Tracy's current system. It is simpler (read quicker to build and get flying) and probably works better than my BETTER system. Hey, we are all true experimenters to even be considering using an "alternate" engine, just a matter of degree! What's for sale Rusty? Bernie