Return-Path: <ALVentures@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 769613 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:12:11 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=ALVentures@cox.net
Received: from BigAl ([68.7.14.39]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050304061122.DUCE22013.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@BigAl>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:11:22 -0500
From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Test Results/DRAG
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:11:23 -0800
Message-ID: <004701c52080$fe0b8e00$6400a8c0@BigAl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
In-Reply-To: <list-768693@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Importance: Normal


 >>> I thought less flow might be partially / substantially compensated 
for by greater dT you would achieve from slower flow through the same 
radiator.  Is this not significant?

Jim;

A larger dT = lower average radiator temperature since the high end temp is
limited to about 220F.  The result is  the need for a larger radiator to do
the same job.

Al