Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 02:24:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from BAY0-SMTP10.adinternal.hotmail.com ([65.54.241.117] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP id 2360170 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 May 2003 01:08:45 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [68.7.218.110] X-Originating-Email: [alventures@msn.com] Received: from BigAl ([68.7.218.110]) by BAY0-SMTP10.adinternal.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Thu, 22 May 2003 22:08:43 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Al Gietzen" X-Original-To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: FS: New Turrentine built 13b FS- great deal! X-Original-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 22:08:49 -0700 Organization: ALVentures X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c320e9$68c7cfe0$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Original-Return-Path: alventures@email.msn.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2003 05:08:43.0965 (UTC) FILETIME=[61F87ED0:01C320E9] Very very reliable 190-200 hp. --------- And where does this number come from? Al --------------- ===> Bruce recently reworked my engine, with 9.7 rotors, and a street port. He estimated 200 HP at 6200 RPM, and 230 HP at 7500 RPM. He doesn't dyno the engines when he builds them, but customers have likely tested a few. It's all a bit of an estimate, but the numbers sound pretty reasonable to me. Pardon my questioning, but until you see the dyno data, it is just a guess. I'm sure it's possible, I just don't think it's helpful tossing numbers around that haven't been measured. Personally, I can't quite imagine being an engine supplier without having access to dyno to test the product. Of course you can lie with data too. I have a dyno chart from Altrudyne showing torque, hp, and BSFC where the hp curve was apparently arbitrarily raise so the hp peaked out at 100 hp per rotor at 6000. Computing the hp from the corresponding torque gives 89. Go figure. Al