Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:51:15 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2358963@logan.com>
From: John Overman <mooneydryver@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Tuned induction
In-Reply-To: <list-2358234@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Al Gietzen <alventures@email.msn.com> wrote:
> Further to my recent response to Tracy's posting, I
> wanted to clarify
> that I was not disagreeing that there benefits to be
> gained from tuned
> induction. Clearly there are.  I would just like to
> see some hard data
> to support that the way it is being done with the
> "wrap-over" tubes is
> really giving significant benefits.  Is anybody
> really getting more than
> about 85 hp/rotor at 6000 rpm in their NA engine.
> 
>  
> 
> I question it based of theory; not on fact.  There
> is a reason why pipe
> organ pipes are straight


Oh Contraire Mon Amie:
As a lad I lelped my father remove a pipe organ from a
theater and install it in our house. Even though it
had twelve foot ceilings some of the pipes had to be
mitered to go up and then across the ceiling, in fact
some of them were mitered twice and went back down
towards the floor.There was no descernable loss in
clairity. 
                  John


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com