Return-Path: Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net ([204.127.203.211] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 723298 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:06:27 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.203.211; envelope-from=btilley@mchsi.com Received: from [192.168.1.101] (12-218-75-244.client.mchsi.com[12.218.75.244]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20050210100542m9100ou6oee>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:05:42 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <006067e7b556969e2d01e25ed52f26c1@mchsi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Tilley Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ellison, the missing piece Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:05:40 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) All, I guess this is why you shouldn't post when you don't have time to proofread! My wife says I "assume" people know where I am coming from. I don't mind running in a NA mode for a while to do the testing. I know that the Ellison is not for a Turbo. My EC2 hasn't arrived yet, as well as my intake and TB from Bruce. So I was going to have to wait on them. I am a good mechanic and trouble shooter. That is why I didn't have reservations of building my own plane. Bob On Feb 9, 2005, at 5:28 PM, Bob Tilley wrote: > All, > > I'm putting my base engine together this weekend. I will be going > turbo or supercharged. And like Dale R. I hope to have 40 hrs on the > engine prior to installing it. If someone has an old used manifold I > could use I would be willing to test the system out, and do whatever > is necessary to prove or disprove the theories. I can't tell you how > much help you guys have been to me so far, & now it is time for me to > start repaying. I love the idea of the Mazda 13b and it kins being > used in planes.