Return-Path: Received: from web41526.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.94.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with SMTP id 723012 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:58:47 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.94.133; envelope-from=tomtugan@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 25975 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Feb 2005 01:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050210015800.25973.qmail@web41526.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.224.93.112] by web41526.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:58:00 PST Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:58:00 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1306287410-1108000680=:25287" --0-1306287410-1108000680=:25287 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Jerry, Since only one rotor chamber is drawing fuel/air at any given time, why would you not feed them both from a single throttle body? Tom Jerry Hey wrote: George, originally I was going to hook up with a piece of hose over the butted pieces with a couple of hose clamps. That is how I will attach the other end at the throttle bodies. But, we have been considering welding and also building some type of flange. Certainly, for starters I will use the hose and clamp method. Jerry On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:43 PM, George Lendich wrote: > Jerry, > Is that a but weld, OR does the tube go into the bellmouth end OR a > flange that they both go into. > George ( down under) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jerry Hey > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:35 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake > > Yes, it is 1.61 inches. > > > On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 05:39 PM, Tom wrote: > > Jerry, > Do you have an i.d. measurement for the narrow end? > > TIA > Tom > > Jerry Hey wrote: > > Today UPS brought the bell mouths for the P port intake. They are > three inches o.d. across and have a smooth gradual taper down to the > runner size ... > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' > --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. --0-1306287410-1108000680=:25287 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Jerry,
Since only one rotor chamber is drawing fuel/air at any given time, why would you not feed them both from a single throttle body?
Tom

Jerry Hey <jerryhey@earthlink.net> wrote:
George, originally I was going to hook up with a piece of hose over the
butted pieces with a couple of hose clamps. That is how I will attach
the other end at the throttle bodies. But, we have been considering
welding and also building some type of flange. Certainly, for starters
I will use the hose and clamp method. Jerry





On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 08:43 PM, George Lendich wrote:

> Jerry,
> Is that a but weld, OR does the tube go into the  bellmouth end OR a
> flange that they both go into.
> George ( down under) 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jerry Hey
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:35 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: P port intake
>
> Yes, it is 1.61 inches.
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 9, 2005, at 05:39 PM, Tom wrote:
>
> Jerry,
> Do you have an i.d. measurement for the narrow end?
>  
> TIA
> Tom
>
> Jerry Hey wrote:
>
> Today UPS brought the bell mouths for the P port intake. They are
> three inches o.d. across and have a smooth gradual taper down to the
> runner size ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. --0-1306287410-1108000680=:25287--