Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:38:57 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2153304@logan.com>
Reply-To: <13brv3@mchsi.com>
From: <13brv3@mchsi.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: still no insurance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2152638@logan.com>

I had the same problem with a hangar in Hawaii.  They wanted full
liability insurance even while I was just building the airframe.
----------------

=3D=3D=3D>  Hi David.  I also had to have builders coverage, even though =
the plane
was at my house, and not the hanger.  Avemco was happy to provide $300k =
of
liability for only $128 a year.  I even have a renewal for that policy =
in
hand.  I consider renewal of this policy as one of the better fallback
plans, though it still isn't right.  I'm sure they mean that you have to
have a liability policy for each aircraft, but I'm not sure it was =
stated
that way in the lease.  If not, I could always keep a cheap builders =
policy
active on some eternal project. Again, not right. =20

It's frustrating to think that I could bolt on a junkyard Lycoming at =
twice
the TBO and get insurance from anyone, but my new rotary can't be =
insured at
any price. I'll keep hammering on the insurance companies, and report my
progress, or lack thereof.=20

Thanks,
Rusty (on the lookout for a new airport)    =20