Return-Path: Received: from mv-relay-1.splasers.com ([65.119.109.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 606833 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:27:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.119.109.133; envelope-from=mike.wynn@spectra-physics.com Received: from usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com (firewall [172.22.1.10]) by mv-relay-1.splasers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0E7iw615308 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:45:03 -0800 Received: by usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:27:06 -0800 Message-ID: <5FA49D34561C5945BA9258B31BF648800355D910@usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com> From: "Wynn, Mike" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: water cooled matrix in the oil pan Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:27:05 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dear All, I was reading through some of the old postings and came across Leon's post in which he suggested putting a water cooled matrix in a modified oil pan (sump). This seems to have a lot going for it. The posting is #1188. Of course there are minor issues like not stuffing the dipstick through the cooler matrix and making sure the oil pick up goes to the right place, but nothing insurmountable. There were no follow up postings and yet it seemed quite a decent idea. What am I missing (apart from pictures of wombats and/or nude moose). mike (lurkalot)