Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b8) with HTTP id 1797306 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:30:39 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: turbo sizing common sense..... To: flyrotary X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b8 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002301c26b08$3b5e6e70$38273d42@office> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Marc Wiese" : Seems only sensible that one would use the sizing chosen for similar hp output aircraft turbos (why not, they work well enough size wise, if not durability wise?) and buys a truck type wet unit of the same size, no? I for one will NOT be using a car type sized turbo of any sort for just that and other reasons.... Marc Wiese > I think this turbo may not be well suited for aircraft use, either. > Just like the stock turbo, this is intended for low altitude applications > and will be pushing, if not exceeding it's surge limits when it gets up > there where the air is thin. These small diameter automotive units are