Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:37:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b4) with ESMTP id 2144378 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:35:28 -0400 Received: from mail3.carolina.rr.com (fe3 [24.93.67.50]) by ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h3NAXOgs028203 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:33:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from o7y6b5 ([24.93.78.62]) by mail3.carolina.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:32:46 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001201c30985$16cdeb00$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: overflow jugs? X-Original-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:42:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C30963.8F89F060" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C30963.8F89F060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: 13brv3@mchsi.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:43 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: overflow jugs? Here is one I recently installed, looks to be around a quart = (perhaps a bit more) and I have found that to be more than adequate, = this one has several orientations you can install it in and then = selected which nozzel to clip off and attach the hose to. However, I = must advise you it is terribly expensive, I found mine at a PEP Boys = auto store for $2.95 Ed Anderson Sounds perfect, since that's all the money I have left :-) It's = hard to believe the tank is heavy duty enough for aircraft use, but if = it wasn't I'm sure you wouldn't be using it. =20 You say it's about a quart, and that it's more than adaquate. I = wonder why Tracy needs something larger than a quart. Since you're both = using dual evap cores, I'm guessing you have about the same volume of = coolant, so I can't see the difference. My biggest problem with a large = tank is finding some place to put it. I can just hear Mike Wills = laughing now :-) Thanks, Rusty Rusty, all I can say, is that I had an aluminum tank (about a pint = capacity) and that turned out to be a bit on the small side. I would = occasionally lose some coolant over the side. Have not had that problem = with the current tank. As to its toughness, only time will tell, but = the price was right {:>) Ed ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C30963.8F89F060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 13brv3@mchsi.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 = 11:43=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = overflow=20 jugs?

    = Here is one I=20 recently installed, looks to be around a quart (perhaps a bit more)=20  and I have found that to be more than adequate, this one has = several=20 orientations you can install it in and then selected which nozzel to = clip=20 off and attach the hose to.  However, I must advise you it is = terribly=20 expensive, I found mine at a PEP Boys auto store for = $2.95

 

Ed = Anderson

 

Sounds = perfect,=20 since that=92s all the money I have left :-)    = It=92s hard to=20 believe the tank is heavy duty enough for aircraft use, but if it = wasn=92t I=92m=20 sure you wouldn=92t be using it.  

 

You say = it=92s about=20 a quart, and that it=92s more than adaquate.  I wonder why=20 Tracy needs = something=20 larger than a quart.  Since you=92re both using dual evap = cores, I=92m=20 guessing you have about the same volume of coolant, so I can=92t see = the=20 difference.  My biggest problem with a large tank is finding = some place=20 to put it.  I can just hear Mike Wills laughing now=20 :-)

 

Thanks,

Rusty

 

 

Rusty, all=20 I can say, is that I had an aluminum tank (about a pint capacity) = and that=20 turned out to be a bit on the small side.  I would occasionally = lose=20 some coolant over the side.  Have not had that problem with the = current=20 tank.  As to its toughness, only time will tell, but the price = was=20 right {:>)

 

Ed

 

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C30963.8F89F060--