Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 532514 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:41:35 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.66; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20041115024120.FBXB2398.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:41:20 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Today's tests, EWP and oil scoop Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:41:33 -0600 Message-ID: <005001c4cabc$9e624800$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0051_01C4CA8A.53C7D800" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C4CA8A.53C7D800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How long did your static run with EWP only last? I only ran it for about 10 minutes, and most of that was trying to warm = it up. I wasted a lot of battery power trying to crank the engine with the EC-2 off, so I didn't want to run the battery down too much to start = again once I re-installed the alternator/wp belt. I've done a lot of static = runs, and have a pretty good feel for how the temps behave. I'm not at all worried about being forced to run on only the EWP after what I saw = today. =20 I'm convinced from what you and Todd have done that I'm going to be able = to get my system to work with two WP136's. I really like the system you're putting together, and would bet a = sizeable sum of money that it will work great. =20 Cheers, Rusty (time to put on the steaks) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C4CA8A.53C7D800 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

How long did your static run with EWP only = last?

I only = ran it for about=20 10 minutes, and most of that was trying to warm it up.  I wasted a = lot of=20 battery power trying to crank the engine with the EC-2 off, so I didn't = want to=20 run the battery down too much to start again once I re-installed the=20 alternator/wp belt.  I've done a lot of static runs, and have a = pretty good=20 feel for how the temps behave.  I'm not at all worried about being = forced=20 to run on only the EWP after what I saw today. 

I'm convinced from what you and Todd have done that I'm going to be = able to=20 get my system to work with two WP136's.

I really like the system = you're putting=20 together, and would bet a sizeable sum of money that it will work = great. =20

Cheers,
Rusty (time to put on = the=20 steaks)
 


 ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C4CA8A.53C7D800--