Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com
From: Lehanover@aol.com
Message-ID: <1d7.2a89a3c1.2e7d88ec@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:49:48 EDT
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Quiet
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/18/2004 5:23:30 AM Central Daylight Time, 
Dastaten@earthlink.net writes:

<< Good info, but low end torque and emissions aren't applicable to an 
aviation mission. >>


I know. I was pointing out why it is done. 

What kind of dreadful state do you live in that won't let you swap engines 
after you get your emissions sticker?

We have random testing in Ohio. And required testing in a few areas where 
pollution is high. I have never seen one of the random testing sites being set 
up. 

Richard Sohn has a single rotor running with both a Pport and one side port. 
He also manufactures spacer gizmos that allow the stock metering pump to be 
fed from a bottle on the firewall. So you can run any top oil you want and a 
different crankcase oil. I use 40Wt Redline racing oil, and Redline 2 cycle top 
oil in a premix at 1.6 oz per gallon.
Nothing that rich is required for a non racing application. 

Lynn E. Hanover